So do you judge based on number of trades? I don't think that works either. What is neglect for you. I know that I'll take an owner that makes a number of trade offers, some trades, and keeps his roster changes going. I don't care if he uses the robot or plays the games himself(in my 7 leagues I have an overall .600 winning pct, but my home record was only 5 games better than my road record - the robot is pretty good), or a combination of both.

If an owner is a great drafter but we thing he neglects his teams but he still finishes above .550 in winning pct, so what, he is providing great competition.

There are many parts to this game, from drafting, trading, making cuts, making lineups, playing games, etc. that who decides which is most important? How do you measure all of those different aspects?