Note: This section is now in read-only mode.
Please use our new community site for future posts.

Back To Board

Abuse

Posted By Parch

It's unfortunate that some guys will abuse the situation by blatently using players out of position, but I say so what. The game can create enough penalty to hurt them in the long run.

It's when a manager gets severely penalized because of circumstance that I don't like. I had my centerfielder get a daily injury, and his replacement gives up 5 errors.

Somebody mentioned that defensive ratings should be a combination of the last two seasons. I like that idea. For example I have Tony Batista. He was an ODR 6+ rated shortstop, but switched positions so all of a sudden he's useless at short? I got Pat Meares, a guy who had played short his entire life, and now hasn't played there this year. It seems like I'm constantly looking for a shortstop, even though I have two players that are quite capable of playing the position. If there was a two year rating then it gives you more time to trade or draft to improve the weak position.

I know the first response is why not make a trade immediately. Too often when guys see that you're weak at a key position they expect to get a bargain because of it. I get nothing but stupid offers because they think I'm "desperate" for a key position. To hell with that. I'll use an innoc player before I'll accept a rip-off offer. I don't want to severly weaken my team simply because the game has defensive inflexibility.

I guess it's a fine balance. Create enough penalty so that abuse is avoided, but don't severly penalize a legit manager because of circumstance. Sometimes a little defensive flexibility is required, and nobody should be forced into making a deal they don't want to do.