Note: This section is now in read-only mode. |
resource allocation
I think from the negative posts about dropping from 24 to 20 team leagues, it is obvious that 24 team leagues are preferred.
Although I know that only you can tell for sure, it would seem to me that the resources to change ownership of teams would be less than the resources needed to drop leagues from 24 to 20 and have reallocation drafts for which currently there is not procedure.
You must have a simple way to assign teams to new owners. That is surely a common practice.
I'm just trying to be helpful and I support whatever decisions you end up making.
I do think that the health of the leagues will be better served by temporary owners than by permanently dropping leagues to 20 teams that are now 24 teams.