Almost everyone differs on the fairness of any trade.Especially when many players and draft picks are offered.
Players values go up a down through the course of
the season.
Many veteran owners make one sided trades because
they want more value than the players are worth to justify trading a favorite player.
The system isnt perfect but in most cases works good enough for me.
I would not want to be the one who has the final say on a trade.Even if i took the time to study all possible info on both the teams involved.
Someone is still going have a different opinion.
Most of the time i have had trades rejected, another player or two was added to get the trade through.
I believe that in most cases it's not the fact the trade was rejected on balance that angers some owners.It's the fact their trade judgement was questioned or rejected.
I try to put my self in Mikes shoes and after looking at the many trades i wouldnt want the job.
But someone has to do it IMO. Any volunteers ?