...are unfair trades or no trades are the only acceptable options. And, to the second point, are you the person - and not Mike- who should be answering for this. The new trade option was not at any time limited in it's scope to aid and only aid the unmanaged teams. If that was the case, why wasn't that spelled out. And please don't hand me that oxymoron, "clearly implied". If it's clear - it's stated. Implication, any implication, leaves itself open to imterpretation. There is nothing clear in it.