I don't agree with the Commissioner or Rob C or Brian B about this matter. How can the Commissioner over rule a fair trade that has been signed by both parties? This opens up alot of unethical tools and the main tool will always be if a owner changes his mind after he signs or gets a better offer "my son(if you have one or not) signed the trade by mistake" you can say anything you want but to get the commissioner to reject a fair trade but the commissioner should let it stands and just give you a new password. The commissioner is looking at this one sided-what about the owner who has sent a fair trade and seen its been signed and makes other trades since he understands he has a deal? is it fair to him and is it fair to for the commissioner to alter rules. If your going to let "my son signed the trade for me" stand then just make a rule that any one who signs a trade and changes their mind can have the commissioner reject it.