Greg has a point, but, there are several problems with said idea. 1st off he mentioned the big one it would make trading an exceedling slow process. The second and more important problem would be if say 2 people put there offers up each manager would feel like he made the better offer and it would lead to problems. The 3rd thing is confidentiality. Why should someone else know of something your trying to do to improve your team. It can lead to problems and ill feelings. The simpleest thing is as far as managerless trades are concerned is to keep the status quo. Mike seems to do what is best for the managerless teams with very few exceptions. I know when I look at trades, I don't think or want to think what's best for the league but what's best for my individual team and that's what everyone else does as well. That's what Mike does too except his job is more difficult as he is trying to get those teams sold. Just a few thoughts and I'd like to hear comments.