If it is the concensus to do this, we need to realize that this will in no way increase the number of teams people have but if anything, it will decrease them. Maybe for some, the money isn't an issue but for me it is. I can not afford the luxury of owning 11 teams if I am paying for each one. Like Fred said below, many of the founders have so many teams because they don't cost anything. I suppose that's a given but we need to realize that many more teams are going to be unmanaged when this happens because I alone will be dumping 6 or 7 and I'm sure other owners will do the same. Will the break given to non-founders offset this? I don't know but I doubt it. I do know this, however, we already have too many teams that are unmanaged in many of the leagues as it is and it will likely get worse with this change.

Some will be so bad that they should just be disbanded. JMHO.