Anthony has a good point about the Bonds possible deal. There are a few reasons too disagree with him and all of his points are valid. The question I have is I'm sure Mike would have dealt him before the 120 game mark if someone had given him a fair offer for him. Noone did and the fact that other managers tried to improve there teams in different ways was smarter than dealing for Bonds at what should be a high price. On any of my contending teams I would not want Bonds. He's worthless next season excpet for a few good AB's and there's a good chance he'll retire soon because of his knees. The balance of power may shift because of this deal, but, if the managerless team gets a FA 1 and rook 1 then the deal will help the managerless team more and there by making it more sellable so we may have another owner in the league which is a good thing.